Skip to content
AI Edit
QGIS
Guide

Greenfield vs Brownfield Sites: Meaning and Differences

Published Updated

The Gas Works Park site in Seattle in 1973, a former gasworks on the lake shore before it became a park.
Photo: Seattle Municipal Archives, CC BY 2.0, Wikimedia Commons.

A greenfield site is land that has never been developed: a field, a wood, a meadow at the edge of town. A brownfield site is land that was developed before and now sits vacant or underused, often with the slabs, sheds or contamination of its previous life still on it. The words also name two kinds of software project, and the last question on this page covers that.

The difference in one line

Greenfield has no past to deal with. Brownfield has one, and the cost of building there is the cost of dealing with it.

GreenfieldBrownfield
Built on beforeNoYes, and the use has ended
What is there nowCrops, grass, treesEmpty buildings, slabs, sealed ground
Cost before buildingRoads, pipes, a planning fightDemolition, ground investigation, clean-up
What planning policy saysProtect itReuse it first

How each looks from the air

Greenfield reads as texture with no straight lines inside it: the stripes of a ploughed field, the mottled top of a wood, a hedge as the only edge.

Brownfield reads as geometry that has lost its purpose: rectangular slabs with weeds in the joints, a roof with holes, rail sidings that stop at nothing, fences around nothing.

The edge of a village in Eure-et-Loir on the IGN orthophoto: ploughed fields, a hedge and a wood as the only edges, and the housing estate that stops at the last parcel.
Greenfield: the parcels between the last houses and the wood. Orthophoto: IGN, BD ORTHO, open licence.
The former Petit-Couronne refinery near Rouen on the IGN orthophoto: storage tanks, bare pads where tanks have gone, internal roads that serve nothing.
Brownfield: the Petit-Couronne refinery, shut in 2013. Orthophoto: IGN, BD ORTHO, open licence.

The one that catches people out is mown grass. A gasworks capped and grassed twenty years ago looks like a park from the air. It is still brownfield, and the register says so.

How to tell them apart in QGIS

  • Look at the imagery. Your national orthophoto or a satellite basemap, at about 1:2,000. Apply the two cues above.
  • Look at the past. A historical imagery slider (IGN's Remonter le temps in France, USGS EarthExplorer in the United States). A parcel that had buildings in 1990 and none today is brownfield, whatever the grass says.
  • Check the register. Cartofriches in France, the council's Brownfield Land Register in England, the EPA's Cleanups in My Community map in the United States. If the parcel is listed, the question is settled.

What the registers hold: Rouen and Birmingham, counted

Around Rouen, the brownfield land France's national inventory confirms covers more ground than the metropolis built over on farmland, woods and natural land in the ten years to 2021: 784 ha on 222 sites, against 665 ha. We counted it on 23 September 2026 from Cartofriches (export of 15 June 2026) and Cerema's land-take figures for the 71 communes of the Métropole Rouen Normandie.

Métropole Rouen Normandie, 71 communesSitesHectares
Friches with no project110228
Friches with a project under way112556
Friches already reused92218
Greenfield built on, 2011 to 2021665
Greenfield built on, 2021 to 2025185

Only the no-project friches are land nobody has claimed yet. At 228 ha they equal about 3.4 years of greenfield take at the 2011 to 2021 pace, or 4.9 years at the slower pace since. The Petit-Couronne refinery in the aerial above is three entries: 59 ha already reused, then 103 ha and 19 ha with a logistics project.

Map of the 71 communes of the Rouen metropolis with confirmed friches in orange (no project) and blue (project under way), beside bars comparing their hectares with the greenfield land built on since 2011.
Métropole Rouen Normandie. Friches: Cartofriches, Cerema, 15 June 2026. Land take: Cerema, 1 January 2011 to 1 January 2025. Counted by TerraLab on 23 September 2026.

An English register lists housing sites, not all brownfield

England's registers answer a narrower question: which previously developed sites the council thinks suit housing. Birmingham's, last updated on 5 December 2025, lists 703 current sites on 603 ha. Three sites in four (76%) already have planning permission, yet they cover only 40% of the area. The small plots are agreed; 9 of the 17 sites over 5 ha are not.

What you get when you load them in QGIS

Every one of Cartofriches' 36,241 sites comes with an outline, so you can measure it, intersect it with your parcels or clip imagery to it. England's national file on planning.data.gov.uk gives a point for 28,133 of its 29,941 entries with no end date, and an outline for none: the shape sits in a plan linked from each row, and the area is a number typed by the council.

Neither register settles contamination. Cartofriches records soil pollution as unknown on 31,315 sites (86%) and as confirmed on 516. The English registers have no pollution field at all: their "hazardous substances" column is about hazardous substances consent, and 183 entries fill it.

How we measured this

We kept the Cartofriches sites marked "friche sans projet" or "friche avec projet" and summed the area of their outlines, which do not overlap. The 124 "potential" friches stay out: they are unverified, and one is a 365 ha commune holding. Greenfield take is Cerema's consumption of natural, agricultural and forest land for every use, built from land tax files, so it is not measured the way a friche outline is. Birmingham's figures come from the council's own workbook. Licences, as the providers state them: Licence Ouverte 2.0 for both Cerema datasets, Open Government Licence v3.0 for planning.data.gov.uk. One metropolis and one city are two places, not a national rate.

Questions people ask

Is a brownfield site always contaminated?

No. In British usage brownfield means previously developed, and a clean former car park qualifies: the National Planning Policy Framework defines previously developed land as "land which has been lawfully developed and is or was occupied by a permanent structure", and its glossary entry for brownfield land reads "See Previously developed land". In American usage the word implies possible contamination: the US EPA defines a brownfield as "a property where expansion, redevelopment or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant". The registers will not tell you either: Cartofriches marks soil pollution as unknown on 86% of its sites, and England's registers carry no pollution field. For a specific site, only a ground investigation answers.

What is a friche?

The French word for a brownfield site. Since 25 August 2021 the planning code defines it, in article L111-26, as any property "unused, and whose state, layout or occupation does not allow reuse without prior development or works" (our translation). The national inventory is Cartofriches, run by Cerema: on 15 June 2026 it listed 36,241 sites: 20,487 confirmed friches, 14,020 potential ones still to check, and 1,734 already reused.

What do greenfield and brownfield mean in software?

A greenfield project starts from nothing. A brownfield project changes a system that is already running, with all its constraints. Same metaphor: one is a clean site, the other has a past to work around.

The QGIS AI hub collects what AI can and cannot do inside QGIS.